---
title: Two diabetes drug classes, two different stone risks. Korean national data put the gap at about half
publication: Medical Insights Korea
section: news
category: Kidney Stones
canonical_url: https://medicalinsightskorea.com/news/sglt2-inhibitors-kidney-stone-risk-korea
author: Chloe Moon
published: 2026-09-14T09:00:00+09:00
modified: 2026-09-14T09:00:00+09:00
content_type: reporting
license: Quotation permitted with attribution to Medical Insights Korea and a link to the canonical URL.
---

# Two diabetes drug classes, two different stone risks. Korean national data put the gap at about half

In 117,006 matched pairs from the National Health Insurance Service, patients starting an SGLT2 inhibitor had a nephrolithiasis rate of 0.65 per 100 person-years against 1.12 on a DPP-4 inhibitor. The relative benefit was larger in people who had never had a stone; the absolute benefit was larger in those who had.

## Answer

In a target trial emulation using the Korea National Health Insurance Service database from 2010 to 2021, patients with type 2 diabetes who started a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor had a lower rate of incident nephrolithiasis than propensity-score matched patients who started a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor — 0.65 versus 1.12 events per 100 person-years over a mean of 654 days, a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.57) — with a hazard ratio of 0.43 among people who had never formed a stone and 0.64 among those who had, so the relative reduction was larger in never-formers while the absolute reduction was larger in previous stone formers.

## Key takeaways

- A Korea National Health Insurance Service study covering 2010 to 2021 compared patients with type 2 diabetes starting an SGLT2 inhibitor against propensity-score matched patients starting a DPP-4 inhibitor.
- Matching produced 105,378 pairs among people who had never formed a stone and 11,628 pairs among previous stone formers, 117,006 pairs in total.
- Over a mean of 654 days, incident nephrolithiasis occurred at 0.65 events per 100 person-years on SGLT2 inhibitors against 1.12 on DPP-4 inhibitors, a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.57).
- Among never-formers the hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.48); among previous stone formers it was 0.64 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.69).
- The absolute reduction ran the other way: an incidence rate difference of 0.32 fewer events per 100 person-years in never-formers against 2.26 fewer in previous stone formers.
- Osteoarthritis encounters, used as a negative control outcome, showed near-null associations, and results were consistent across sex, age, thiazide co-use and baseline cardiovascular risk.
- In a Korean health-screening cohort of 40,687 people followed from 1995 to 2009, metabolic syndrome and each of its component traits were risk factors for nephrolithiasis.

## Full article

Very few people choose a diabetes drug with their kidneys' stone-forming chemistry in mind, and no guideline asks them to. Korean national data now suggest the choice carries a urological consequence large enough to be worth naming out loud, particularly for the patient who has already passed one stone.

### What was compared, and how

A study in Diabetes Care used the Korea National Health Insurance Service database from 2010 to 2021 to emulate a trial that has not been run: patients with type 2 diabetes starting a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, against patients starting a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. The two groups were matched one to one on propensity score, separately in people who had never formed a stone and in people who had.

- Stone never-formers: 105,378 matched pairs.
- Previous stone formers: 11,628 matched pairs.
- Total: 117,006 matched pairs, followed for a mean of 654 days.

The comparison is deliberately drug-against-drug rather than drug-against-nothing. Comparing a treated group with an untreated one in claims data mostly measures who gets treated. Comparing two drug classes prescribed to the same kind of patient for the same indication removes much of that, and the study added a check most do not: osteoarthritis encounters as a negative control outcome, an event neither drug should influence. Those associations were near-null, which is what a working design looks like.

### The result

**0.65 vs 1.12** — incident nephrolithiasis per 100 person-years on SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors in matched Korean pairs, hazard ratio 0.54  
_Source: Shin A, Shin JY, Kang EH, Diabetes Care, 2025_

Pooled across both strata the hazard ratio was 0.54, with a confidence interval from 0.50 to 0.57. The subgroup analyses by sex, age, thiazide co-use and baseline cardiovascular risk were consistent.

### The two numbers that point in opposite directions

This study is a clean example of why a relative risk on its own can mislead a clinical decision, and it is worth reading slowly.

**SGLT2 inhibitor versus DPP-4 inhibitor, by prior stone history**

|  | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | Fewer events per 100 person-years |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Never formed a stone | 0.43 (0.39–0.48) | 0.32 |
| Previous stone former | 0.64 (0.59–0.69) | 2.26 |

The relative reduction is much larger in people who have never had a stone — a 57 percent lower hazard against 36 percent. The absolute reduction is seven times larger in people who have. Both statements are true of the same data, and only the second one tells a urologist which patient the drug choice actually matters for.

> **Why the absolute figure is the clinically useful one**  
> A large proportional cut in a small risk saves few events. Previous stone formers start with a much higher rate, so a smaller proportional cut removes far more stones per hundred patients treated. That is the group in which a diabetes drug choice would be worth a urological conversation, and it is precisely the group a relative-risk headline would send to the back of the queue.

### Where this sits in Korean stone risk

Diabetes is not a bystander in Korean stone disease. The national cohort analysis that estimated Korea's lifetime prevalence of urolithiasis at 11.5 percent named diabetes among the contributing factors, alongside age over 60, income level, body mass index, hypertension and a cancer history.

An older Korean study makes the metabolic link directly. Following 40,687 people attending a health promotion centre between 1995 and 2009, with kidney ultrasonography as well as anthropometric and biochemical measurement, it found nephrolithiasis in 1.5 percent — 1.9 percent of men against 1.0 percent of women — and identified metabolic syndrome and each of its component traits as risk factors. In men, high body mass index, high blood pressure and abnormal glucose metabolism were each significant; in women, high body mass index and abnormal glucose metabolism.

### What a claims study cannot deliver

This is an emulation, not a randomised trial, and propensity-score matching on measured variables cannot balance what the database never recorded — fluid intake, occupational heat exposure, diet, or urine chemistry, all of which bear on stone formation and none of which appear in a claim. The negative control result argues that gross confounding by health-seeking behaviour is unlikely; it cannot exclude confounding specific to stone risk.

The follow-up is also short for a disease measured in decades. A mean of 654 days is under two years, and Korea's own national data put recurrence at 21.3 percent within five. Whether the separation between the two drug classes widens, holds or closes over a stone patient's actual horizon is not answered here.

What the study does establish is a difference large enough, in a cohort large enough, to belong in the conversation. For a Korean patient with type 2 diabetes who has already formed a urinary stone, which glucose-lowering class is started is not a urologically neutral decision.

## Sources

- Shin A, Shin JY, Kang EH. Risk of nephrolithiasis associated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP4 inhibitors among patients with type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation study. Diabetes Care 2025;48(2):193-201. doi:10.2337/dc24-1652. PMID:39666579. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1652
- Jung HS, Chang IH, Kim KD, Moon YT, Kim TH, Myung SC, Kim YS, Lee JY. Possible relationship between metabolic syndrome traits and nephrolithiasis: incidence for 15 years according to gender. Korean Journal of Urology 2011;52(8):548-553. doi:10.4111/kju.2011.52.8.548. PMID:21927702. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2011.52.8.548
- Tae BS, Balpukov U, Cho SY, Jeong CW. Eleven-year cumulative incidence and estimated lifetime prevalence of urolithiasis in Korea: a National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort based study. Journal of Korean Medical Science 2018;33(2):e13. doi:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e13. PMID:29215822. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e13

## Citation

Chloe Moon (2026). "Two diabetes drug classes, two different stone risks. Korean national data put the gap at about half". Medical Insights Korea. https://medicalinsightskorea.com/news/sglt2-inhibitors-kidney-stone-risk-korea

Retrieved from https://medicalinsightskorea.com/news/sglt2-inhibitors-kidney-stone-risk-korea