Gallbladder
Surgeons stopped escaping difficult gallbladders by opening the abdomen. What they do instead is safer for the bile duct and harder on everything else
A society review of subtotal cholecystectomy puts bile duct injury at 0.3 percent and overall complications at 24.7 percent. That trade needs stating whenever a low conversion rate is offered as proof of surgical quality.
By David Seo
Reporter
- Published
- Reading time
- 6 minutes
In short
In a Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract systematic review and meta-analysis, subtotal cholecystectomy — the bailout used when the critical view of safety cannot be achieved — carried a bile duct injury rate of 0.3 percent alongside a bile leak rate of 13.5 percent, overall complications of 24.7 percent, readmission of 17.8 percent and reoperation of 6.3 percent.
Key takeaways
- In a Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract systematic review, subtotal cholecystectomy carried bile duct injury in 0.3 percent of patients, bile leak in 13.5 percent, retained stones in 6.1 percent, overall complications in 24.7 percent, readmission in 17.8 percent, reoperation in 6.3 percent and mortality in 0.8 percent.
- Compared with total cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy had significantly higher rates of bile leak, retained stones, overall complications, readmission, reoperation and postoperative ERCP, with no significant difference in mortality, intensive care admission or length of stay.
- An earlier meta-analysis of 85 studies covering 3,645 subtotal cholecystectomies reported bile duct injury in 7 patients (0.2 percent) and bile leak in 506 (13.9 percent), closely matching the newer figures.
- A meta-analysis of preoperative risk factors for conversion to open surgery found the largest odds ratios for acute cholecystitis (5.475) and age over 60 (4.324), followed by previous upper abdominal surgery (3.301) and heart disease (2.947).
- At one German secondary referral centre, 1,534 laparoscopic cholecystectomies over ten years produced a 2.0 percent conversion rate, with 84 percent of conversions occurring in emergency cases.
There is a moment in a gallbladder operation when the surgeon cannot see well enough to proceed. The tissue is inflamed to the point where the cystic duct and the bile duct are no longer distinguishable, and the discipline of the operation says that nothing may be divided until they are.
For thirty years the answer to that moment was to make a larger incision and finish the operation by hand. Increasingly it is not. The gallbladder is left partly in place instead — its neck and a rim of wall abandoned where the danger is — and the operation ends laparoscopically. That change is well justified by what it prevents. It is less often described by what it costs.
What subtotal cholecystectomy actually produces
The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract published a state-of-the-art systematic review and meta-analysis of the procedure in 2026, synthesising studies from 2010 to mid-2025.
| Outcome | Rate |
|---|---|
| Bile duct injury | 0.3% |
| Bile leak | 13.5% |
| Retained stones | 6.1% |
| Overall complications | 24.7% |
| Readmission | 17.8% |
| Postoperative ERCP | 16.2% |
| Reoperation | 6.3% |
| Percutaneous drainage | 5.7% |
| Mortality | 0.8% |
0.3% vs 24.7%
Those two numbers are the whole argument. The procedure exists to avoid the injury that ruins a life, and it does that well. It achieves it by leaving behind a structure that leaks, retains stones, and sends one patient in six back for an endoscopic procedure afterwards.
Set against total cholecystectomy, the review found subtotal significantly worse for bile leak, retained stones, overall complications, readmission, reoperation and postoperative ERCP — and no different for mortality, intensive care admission or length of stay. The morbidity is real and it is mostly the kind that is fixed with another procedure rather than the kind that kills.
The technique variant that matters
Subtotal cholecystectomy is done in two ways. The reconstituting version closes the gallbladder remnant so that it holds; the fenestrating version leaves it open and drains. Both reviews found the choice consequential in the same direction: the 2026 analysis reported significantly higher bile leak and longer stay after the fenestrating technique, and the earlier review found the reconstituting approach associated with lower risk across eleven of the outcomes it examined.
The 2026 review also identified patient factors that shift the risk. Diabetes was linked to higher rates of leak, complications and ERCP; male sex to more surgical site infection.
Which gallbladders become difficult
The conditions that force a bailout are largely known before the operation begins. A systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative risk factors for conversion to open surgery pooled the published odds ratios.
| Factor | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Acute cholecystitis | 5.475 | 2.959–10.130 |
| Age over 60 | 4.324 | 3.396–5.506 |
| Previous upper abdominal surgery | 3.301 | 1.965–5.543 |
| Heart disease | 2.947 | 1.047–8.296 |
| Diabetes | 2.576 | 1.687–3.934 |
| Obesity | 2.228 | 1.162–4.271 |
| Hypertension | 1.931 | 1.018–3.662 |
| Male sex | 1.907 | 1.254–2.901 |
None of these is modifiable on the morning of surgery. What they permit is planning: knowing before the first incision which operations are likely to become difficult, and staffing and scheduling them accordingly.
Why a low conversion rate is an incomplete boast
A German secondary referral centre reported its ten-year record in 2026: 1,534 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 31 conversions to open, a rate of 2.0 percent, and bile duct injury in 0.26 percent. Eighty-four percent of the conversions were emergency cases. The authors propose that a low conversion rate together with a low complication rate can serve as a marker of surgical quality.
As stated, with both halves attached, that is defensible. The half that cannot be dropped is the second one. A conversion rate can be driven toward zero by finishing difficult operations subtotally instead, and the pooled evidence says that route carries a 24.7 percent complication rate and returns one patient in six for an endoscopic procedure. A unit reporting its conversion rate alone is reporting the denominator of its own choice.
What is missing here
- None of these figures is Korean. Published Korean series reporting conversion rates or subtotal cholecystectomy outcomes at national scale were not available; the Korean number this publication has is a bile duct injury rate of 0.7 percent across 18 academic institutions, which is not the same measurement.
- The subtotal figures are pooled across studies with different definitions of a difficult gallbladder and different thresholds for abandoning a total cholecystectomy, so the 24.7 percent complication rate describes a heterogeneous group of operations.
- Comparisons of subtotal against total cholecystectomy are comparisons between patients who were selected into each, not between randomised arms. Subtotal is performed on the worst gallbladders by definition, and no adjustment removes that.
- The German series is one centre and 1,534 operations, which is a description of that unit rather than a benchmark other units are obliged to meet.
Sources
- 1
Nadeem MA, Awan AR, Wehrle CJ, Tsutsumi A, Darby F, Bhandarkar S, et al.
Operative strategies for the acute difficult gallbladder: a Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract state-of-the-art systematic review and meta-analysis of subtotal cholecystectomy outcomesJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2026;30(4):102345
doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2026.102345 · PMID:41644007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2026.102345 - 2
Nzenwa IC, Mesri M, Lunevicius R
Risks associated with subtotal cholecystectomy and the factors influencing them: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies published between 1985 and 2020Surgery 2021;170(4):1014-1023
doi:10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.036 · PMID:33926707
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.036 - 3
Magnano San Lio R, Barchitta M, Maugeri A, Quartarone S, Basile G, Agodi A
Preoperative Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;20(1):408
doi:10.3390/ijerph20010408 · PMID:36612732
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010408 - 4
Schwarz J, Reithmann C, Rothe M, Allescher HD, Vogelsang H
Conversion Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Critical BenchmarkJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A 2026;36(5):356-359
doi:10.1177/10926429261421340 · PMID:41733426
https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261421340 - 5
Lee H, Han IW, Choi JE, Lee HK
Surgical risk calculator development for postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter prospective cohort studyAnnals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2025;108(6):352-361
doi:10.4174/astr.2025.108.6.352 · PMID:40503269
https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.108.6.352
Related
News · Gallbladder
Gallbladder surgery in South Korea: what the evidence says about who gets operated on, how safely, and what happens next
Korea removes three times as many gallbladders as it did fifteen years ago. This is what the published evidence establishes about that operation, and where it runs out.
James Choi8 min read
News · Gallbladder
Korea now has its own number for the worst thing that can go wrong in gallbladder surgery: 0.7 percent
A prospective study across 18 Korean academic hospitals put surgery-related complications at 2.5 percent and bile duct injury at 0.7 percent. Seventeen injuries in 2,514 operations is a small foundation for the risk calculator built on it.
David Seo6 min read
News · Gallbladder
Two meta-analyses published weeks apart disagree about whether robotic gallbladder surgery injures more bile ducts. Read the confidence intervals
One pooled 1.77 million patients and found no difference. The other pooled 412,000 and found triple the risk. They are less contradictory than they look, and neither settles the question.
David Seo6 min read