Gallbladder
Cholecystectomies in Korea more than tripled in fifteen years. The national study points at CT scanners
Nationwide insurance data shows the age-standardised rate rising from 67.7 to 211.4 per 100,000. Its authors name increasing computed tomography use as a probable primary cause.
By James Choi
Reporter
- Published
- Reading time
- 5 minutes
In short
The age-standardised rate of cholecystectomy in South Korea rose from 67.7 to 211.4 per 100,000 between 2003 and 2017, and the authors of the nationwide health insurance claims study identified increasing use of computed tomography as a probable primary cause of the rise.
Key takeaways
- The age-standardised cholecystectomy rate in South Korea rose from 67.7 to 211.4 per 100,000 between 2003 and 2017, more than tripling in fifteen years.
- The authors of the National Health Insurance Service claims study named increasing use of computed tomography as a probable primary cause of the trend.
- Average length of stay for cholecystectomy fell from 10.6 days in 2003 to 6.9 days in 2017 over the same period.
- Rates were consistently higher in women than in men and rose with patient age, with surgery increasingly performed at specialised centres.
- A 2026 meta-analysis of 25,924 people with asymptomatic gallstones found that 19 percent developed symptoms within ten years.
A gallstone that has never caused pain is not a disease so much as a finding. Whether it becomes a diagnosis depends on whether anybody looks. Over fifteen years, South Korea looked a great deal more often, and the number of gallbladders removed each year followed.
What the national data show
A study of the National Health Insurance Service database covering the entire Korean population between 2003 and 2017, published in Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, tracked the age-standardised rate of cholecystectomy against a 2010 population standard. Standardising in this way strips out the effect of an ageing population, so the increase it records is not simply a country growing older.
| 2003 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|
| All patients | 67.7 | 211.4 |
| Women | 71.9 | 221.8 |
| Men | 63.6 | 201.8 |
| Mean length of stay | 10.6 days | 6.9 days |
211.4
The rate rose with age, was consistently higher in women than in men, and shifted toward specialised centres. Length of stay fell by more than a third, which is what the spread of laparoscopic practice looks like in claims data.
Why the authors point at imaging
The explanation the authors offer is not a change in disease. It is a change in detection: increasing use of computed tomography, they write, could be a primary cause of the trend. A scan ordered for something else finds a stone that would otherwise have gone unrecorded, and a finding that has been recorded is difficult to leave alone.
This is a familiar shape. Incidental detection has driven measured incidence in thyroid cancer, in renal masses, and in pulmonary nodules, in each case producing more treatment without a matching change in what was making people ill.
The counterweight in the evidence
What happens to a gallstone left alone was quantified this March. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in PLOS ONE pooled eight cohort studies covering 25,924 people with gallstones that had never caused symptoms.
- 10 percent had developed symptoms at five years.
- 19 percent had developed symptoms at ten years.
- 26 percent had developed symptoms at fifteen years.
The pooled incidence rate was roughly two people per hundred per year. The review's authors recommend conservative management for most patients with asymptomatic gallstones, with attention to the minority at higher risk of developing symptoms.
What the trend data cannot settle
It would be convenient to read these two findings together as evidence that Korea is operating too often. The claims data does not support that conclusion, and it is worth being precise about why.
- Insurance claims do not record whether a patient was symptomatic, so the study cannot say how many of the additional operations were performed on incidental findings.
- Rising detection and rising genuine disease are not mutually exclusive; gallstone prevalence has been increasing internationally.
- The meta-analysis describes what happens to stones left alone, not what would have happened to the particular stones Korean surgeons removed.
Sources
- 1
Jeon CH, Hong J, Jung J, Moon JY, Seo HS
Chronological trends in patients undergoing cholecystectomy in Korea: a nationwide health insurance claims studyAnnals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2022;102(4):205-213
doi:10.4174/astr.2022.102.4.205 · PMID:35475231
https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2022.102.4.205 - 2
Alzoubi M, Omar Saleh A, Omari FA, Shatnawi K, Hyari B, Qashou A, et al.
Asymptomatic gallstones: Cumulative incidence proportion, incidence rate, and risk factors for symptoms development: Systematic review and meta-analysisPLOS ONE 2026;21(3):e0345462
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345462 · PMID:41886405
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345462
Related
News · Gallbladder
Gallbladder surgery in South Korea: what the evidence says about who gets operated on, how safely, and what happens next
Korea removes three times as many gallbladders as it did fifteen years ago. This is what the published evidence establishes about that operation, and where it runs out.
James Choi8 min read
Columns · Gallbladder
My brother had his stone broken up. Why do I have to lose my gallbladder?
A surgeon on why a stone in the urinary tract and a stone in the gallbladder are not treated as the same problem, and on the three things worth establishing before a date is set.
Jongmin Kim6 min read
Columns · Gallbladder
Not every gallbladder is the same operation
A surgeon on what repeated inflammation does to the anatomy, why the number of incisions is the wrong thing to compare, and why the decision that matters is the one made mid-operation.
Jong Je Sung7 min read