Skip to content
Medical InsightsKoreaMedical Insights Korea

Sexual Health

Genital warts are not spread evenly across Korea. A national analysis mapped where they cluster, and what tracks with it

52,009 cases across 250 municipalities in one year, with hotspots in metropolitan and south-eastern areas. The strongest municipal correlate was the share of households with one person in them.

In short

An ecological analysis of 2019 National Health Insurance Service data identified 52,009 cases of condyloma acuminata across South Korea's 250 municipalities, 70.03 percent of them in men, and found the incidence rates significantly spatially clustered (Moran's I 0.335, p below 0.001) with hotspots concentrated in metropolitan and south-eastern regions; in Bayesian spatial regression, higher incidence tracked with a higher percentage of single-person households (adjusted relative risk 1.034, 95 percent credible interval 1.025 to 1.043), a greater share of municipal budget spent on social welfare (1.005, 1.001 to 1.009) and more adult entertainment establishments per 10,000 people (1.006, 1.001 to 1.012).

Key takeaways

  • A total of 52,009 cases of condyloma acuminata were identified across Korea's 250 municipalities in 2019, of which 36,421 — 70.03 percent — were in men.
  • Incidence rates were significantly spatially clustered rather than randomly distributed: Moran's I was 0.335 for incidence rates and 0.395 for case counts, both with p below 0.001.
  • Getis-Ord Gi* analysis placed the high-incidence clusters in metropolitan and south-eastern regions of the country.
  • In Bayesian spatial regression, the percentage of single-person households carried the strongest association with incidence: adjusted relative risk 1.034 per percentage point, 95 percent credible interval 1.025 to 1.043.
  • Two further municipal variables reached significance with small effect sizes — share of municipal budget spent on social welfare (1.005, 1.001 to 1.009) and adult entertainment establishments per 10,000 people (1.006, 1.001 to 1.012).

Sexually transmitted infections are usually discussed as a matter of individual behaviour. This analysis asks a different question: whether the risk in Korea is distributed across the map in a pattern, and if so what features of a place travel with it.

The pattern is not random

Researchers took 2019 municipal-level data from the National Health Insurance Service, covering all 250 municipalities, and tested whether condyloma acuminata incidence was spatially autocorrelated — whether high-incidence areas sit next to other high-incidence areas more often than chance would produce.

Global spatial autocorrelation of condyloma acuminata, Korea, 2019
MeasureMoran's Ip
Incidence rates0.335<0.001
Case counts0.395<0.001

Moran's I runs from −1 to +1, where values near +1 indicate that similar values cluster together. Both results are positive and significant, tested against 999 Monte Carlo permutations. Local cluster detection using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic then placed the high-incidence clusters in metropolitan and south-eastern regions.

What travels with the clusters

Two Bayesian spatial regression models — an intrinsic conditional autoregressive model and a Besag-York-Mollié model — tested municipal-level variables covering health behaviours, socioeconomic indicators, health care access, adult entertainment venue density and risk of sexual violence.

Municipal variables significantly associated with condyloma acuminata incidence, Bayesian spatial models
VariableAdjusted relative risk95% credible interval
Single-person households (%)1.0341.025–1.043
Adult entertainment establishments per 10,0001.0061.001–1.012
Municipal budget spent on social welfare (%)1.0051.001–1.009

aRR 1.034

association between the percentage of single-person households in a municipality and its condyloma acuminata incidence rate, 95 percent credible interval 1.025 to 1.043 — the strongest municipal correlate in the analysis

The effect sizes also deserve reading carefully. An adjusted relative risk of 1.005 for welfare spending means a one-point rise in that share is associated with half a percent more incidence — statistically distinguishable from no effect, and small. Only the single-person household figure is large enough to matter much at plausible differences between municipalities.

The welfare-budget association is the one most likely to be standing in for something else. Municipalities that spend a larger share of their budget on social welfare differ from those that do not in density, age structure and deprivation, all of which have their own relationships with sexually transmitted infection. The model adjusts for the variables it includes and cannot adjust for the ones it does not.

The scale behind the map

This is one year of a condition whose treatment has been rising for over a decade. National claims data shows the number of men treated for anogenital warts rising 3.5-fold between 2007 and 2018, from 32,709 to 114,734, with related costs rising roughly 9.8-fold. An analysis of treatment methods over 2010 to 2019 found most care delivered in primary clinics, with Seoul and Gyeonggi-do carrying the largest patient numbers regardless of treatment type.

That last observation and this one point at the same thing from different data: the burden is concentrated in particular places, and treatment capacity is concentrated there too.

What this does not establish

  1. The design is ecological. Associations hold between municipalities and cannot be transferred to individuals living in them.
  2. The data counts people who received insured care coded as condyloma acuminata in one year. Areas differ in how readily people seek treatment and where they seek it, and a hotspot may partly reflect access rather than incidence.
  3. Cross-sectional data from a single year cannot establish direction or sequence. Nothing here shows that a municipal characteristic preceded the incidence it correlates with.
  4. Adult entertainment venue density is a municipal count, not a measure of anyone's behaviour, and reads as a proxy whose meaning the study does not test.
  5. Two of the three significant associations have effect sizes close to 1, and the paper reports them as significant rather than as substantial.
  6. The study does not name the specific municipalities in its hotspots beyond describing them as metropolitan and south-eastern.

The finding worth carrying is the first one: this is not evenly spread. A condition usually framed as a private matter turns out to have a geography, and the authors argue that spatial surveillance and locally adapted prevention follow from that — which is an argument about where public health effort goes, not about who is at fault.

Sources

  1. Jang J, Park S, Chun BC

    Spatial Clusters of Condyloma Acuminata and the Regional Risk Factors in South Korea: Bayesian Spatial Regression Analysis
  2. Chung H, Choi JB, Kim S, Lee SJ, Bae S

    Prevalence and economic burden of male anogenital wart in Korea: A population-based big data analysis from 2007 to 2018
  3. Kim EJ, Lee JC, Lyu DH, Choi U, Choi JB, Kim KS, et al.

    Trends of genital wart in Korea according to treatment method classification: Big data analysis of health care in 2010-2019