Skip to content
Medical InsightsKoreaMedical Insights Korea

Prostate Cancer

618 Korean men had a prostate MRI before any PSA test. Testing PSA first would have made 90 percent of those scans unnecessary

Nine clinically significant cancers were found. Eight of the nine had a PSA above 3.0 — which is the whole argument against putting the scan first.

In short

In a retrospective study of 618 asymptomatic Korean men with a median age of 61 and no prior PSA testing who voluntarily underwent prostate biparametric MRI as part of a health check-up programme between June 2024 and April 2026, 535 (86.6 percent) were assessed as PI-RADS 1 or 2 and none were biopsied, 83 (13.4 percent) were PI-RADS 3 or above, 66 (10.7 percent) underwent biopsy and 9 (1.5 percent) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer — and a simulated PSA-triggered pathway scanning only men with a PSA above 3.0 ng/mL would have avoided 90.0 percent of the MRI examinations, 69.9 percent of biopsy consultations and 70.2 percent of the biopsies that found no significant cancer, at the cost of missing one of the nine cases.

Key takeaways

  • 618 asymptomatic Korean men, median age 61, underwent biparametric prostate MRI at a health check-up between June 2024 and April 2026 without prior PSA testing.
  • The median PSA in the group, drawn at the same visit, was 0.98 ng/mL.
  • 535 men (86.6 percent) were assessed as PI-RADS 1 or 2, and none of them underwent biopsy.
  • 83 men (13.4 percent) were PI-RADS 3 or above, 66 (10.7 percent) underwent biopsy, and 9 (1.5 percent) had clinically significant prostate cancer.
  • Eight of the nine men with clinically significant cancer had a PSA above 3.0 ng/mL.
  • A simulated PSA-triggered pathway would have avoided 90.0 percent of scans, 69.9 percent of biopsy consultations and 70.2 percent of negative biopsies, while missing one case.
  • Among the 442 men who would have been eligible for the PROSA randomised trial, the PSA-triggered pathway would have missed none of five significant cancers.

Scanning first and testing blood afterwards sounds like the more thorough order, and in trial settings in North America and Europe upfront MRI for prostate cancer screening has looked promising. This is what happened when a Korean centre did it outside a trial, on men who had walked in for a health check.

What the scans found

9 of 618

asymptomatic Korean men screened by upfront biparametric MRI who had clinically significant prostate cancer — 1.5 percent

The pyramid narrows sharply. 535 men were PI-RADS 1 or 2 and stopped there. 83 were PI-RADS 3 or above and were sent for a biopsy conversation; 66 went through with it; 9 had cancer that mattered. That leaves 57 men biopsied and found not to have significant cancer — more than six negative biopsies for every cancer detected.

The comparison that undoes the strategy

Because PSA was drawn at the same visit, the authors could reconstruct what a conventional pathway would have done with the same 618 men: scan only those with a PSA above 3.0 ng/mL. That pathway would have skipped 556 of the 618 scans, cancelled 58 of the 83 biopsy consultations and prevented 40 of the 57 biopsies that found nothing — and missed one of the nine cancers.

The median PSA in this group was 0.98 ng/mL. That number explains the result. Most of the men being scanned had no biochemical reason to be scanned, so the MRI was working on a population where the prior probability of disease was very low — which is exactly the setting in which any test produces more false alarms than findings.

Why the Korean setting changes the answer

The authors conclude that the upfront-MRI pathway is inefficient in Korean men undergoing general health evaluations and that conventional PSA-gating should continue. Their closing point is the more general one: population-level differences should be considered carefully before extrapolating trial results to other settings.

That caution has teeth here. Korean national data shows roughly half of prostate cancer is high-risk at diagnosis and the low-risk share has been falling — a detection profile unlike the Western screening populations the upfront-MRI trials were run in. A strategy designed to find more of the small disease that Korea is not finding much of, deployed in a check-up population with a median PSA under 1.0, is being asked to solve a problem this population does not have.

The design limits are worth keeping in view: a single centre, a self-selected group who chose and paid for a scan, and a retrospective comparison against a simulated pathway rather than a randomised one. What it cannot be dismissed as is theoretical. 618 men had the scan, and the arithmetic of what it cost them is on the record.

Sources

  1. Joo Y, Tse JR, Yoon J, Jung DC, Oh YT, Park JH

    Upfront Biparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Screening: Experience in 618 Korean Men Outside of a Clinical Trial Setting
  2. Ko YH, Kim SW, Son NH

    Incidence of High-Risk Prostate Cancer in Korea: Insights From Real-World Data Between 2010 and 2020